Search Titles. Language Any English German French. The first of these is a methodological study of how to read this challenging work and an exposition of what constitutes a valid historical inference, while the second reviews the validity of the sociological and anthropological inferences presented in contemporary historiography.
Collected Essays on Finance and Economics
Zerahyah ha-Levi of Lunel, who belonged to the Jewish aristocracy of Languedoc, and considers the implications of that relationship. Festschrift -- who is being honored and why? Do the contributors represent a diversity of viewpoints or perspectives? Do the contributions represent essays of general tribute or do they represent original research that builds upon the honoree's prior work? Is there a list of contributors and does it include biographical profiles of each that helps determine their relationship to the honoree? Is there a foreword or an introductory chapter that effectively synthesizes the collection?
Is it logically organized and include important front and back matter, such as, a table of contents and an index? Reader -- does the collection represent a broad spectrum of publications about a research topic or only a few?
Rights and permissions
Are there underrepresented areas of research in the collection? Are the sources making up the collection representative of one or only a few areas of study or do they represent an interdisciplinary perspective about the topic? Are the contents reprinted in their entirety or is the text only excerpted? Are the reprints readily available through other means or do they represent a compilation of hard-to-find publications?
Reprints -- does the collection represent reprints from a variety of publications or only a few? Are the reprints from relatively current or older publications? Is it logically organized and include important front and back matter such as a table of contents and an index? Thematic Articles -- how are the contents arranged? Do the contributions survey a broad area of research or do they examine multiple issues associated with a particular research problem?
Is there a list of contributors and does it include biographical profiles of each? Do you the contributors come from one or a variety of institutions? Do the contributors all come from the United States or are there any international contributors? Does the work include important front and back matter, such as, a table of contents and an index? Structure and Writing Style I.
Bibliographic Information Provide the essential information about the book using the writing style that your professor has asked you to use for the course [e. In general, it would look like this: El Ghonemy, Mohamad Riad. If you find it difficult to discern the overall aims and objectives of the collected essay work [and, be sure to point this out in your review if you believe it to be a deficiency], you may arrive at an understanding of the purpose by asking yourself the following questions: Why did the contributing authors write on this subject rather than on some other subject?
Why is it important? From what point of view is the overall work written? Do some essays systematically take one stance while others investigate another, or do the essays just represent a mish-mash of viewpoints? What is the general field or genre, and how does the book fit into it? Review related literature from other books and journal articles to familiarize yourself with the field, if necessary. Who is the intended audience? Is it very specialized or intended for a broader audience? What are each author's style?
Do they clash or do they flow together? Is it formal or informal? You can evaluate the quality of the writing style by noting some of the following standards: coherence, clarity, originality, forcefulness, correct use of technical words, conciseness, fullness of development, and fluidity. Scan the table of contents because it can help you understand how the book is organized and will aid in determining the main ideas covered and how they are developed [e. Were any prior assumptions you had about the subject changed, abandoned, or reinforced due to this book?
Did some essays stand out more than others? In what ways? How is the book related to your own course or personal agenda? What experiences have you had that relate to the subject? How well has the book achieved its goal s? What are the main takeaways? Would you recommend the book to others? Why or why not? Critically Evaluate the Contents Critical comments should form the bulk of your book review. Ask yourself: Has the purpose of the book been achieved? Have all of the essays contributed something important to the overall purpose? If not, how have some author's failed to add something meaningful?
What contribution does the book make to the field? Is the treatment of the subject matter fair and unbiased? Are there facts and evidence that have been omitted? What kinds of data, if any, are used to support the author's thesis statement? Can the same data be interpreted to alternate ends? Is the writing style clear and effective? Considered collectively, did the essays cover the topic or research problem thoroughly? If not, what issue or perspective about the topic do you believe has been omitted?
Does the book raise important or provocative issues or topics for discussion and further research? Examine the Front Matter and Back Matter Front matter refers to anything before the first chapter of the book. The following front matter may be included in a book and may be considered for evaluation when reviewing its overall quality: Table of contents -- is it clear?
Is it detailed or general? Does it reflect the true contents of the book? Author biographies -- also found as back matter, the biography of author s can be useful in determining the authority of the writer and whether the book builds on prior research or represents new research.
In a collected work, think about the following: what is the distribution of expertise among authors? Does it represent an interdisciplinary perspective or is the scope of expertise more narrow? Are the authors from a variety of institutions or just a few? Are the author affiliations international in scope or just from one country or region? Foreword -- the purpose of a foreword is to introduce the reader to the author as well as the book itself, and to help establish credibility for both.
A foreword may not contribute any additional information about the book's subject matter, but it serves as a means of validating the book's existence. Later editions of a book sometimes have a new foreword prepended [appearing before an older foreword, if there was one], which may be included to explain how the latest edition differs from prior ones. Preface -- generally describes the genesis, purpose, limitations, and scope of the book and may include acknowledgments of indebtedness to people who have helped the author complete the study. She was also perceptive in writing about places: the politics of Chicago, her love of Maine, the many contradictions of Brazil.
But the meat of the collection and by far the larger subject This is a wonderful collection compiled and introduced by Darryl Pinckney.
But the meat of the collection and by far the larger subject is literature and writers. She knew most of her contemporaries she writes about. Her range, though, extends from the s and Margaret Fuller to our present day and Joan Didion. Her judgement seems exact. She considered Nabokov master class.
Writers at Work: The Year in Collected Essays
Pinckney studied under Hardwick, and he uses the same term for her. He writes in his introduction, "Her passions were instructive". It's a comment that's true as well for readers of these essays. Mar 18, Andrew added it Shelves: essays , literary-studies. Do we have critics like this anymore? I honestly don't know. Someone please tell me. Elizabeth Hardwick manages to pull apart literature first, and then the world, examine them inside and out, and always remain aware of her own position, but at the same time, not obsessing over her own self as the interpreter.
Her interpretation is often harsh, but not excessively so, and her adulation is often intense, but not excessively so -- she's more than willing to slap her heroes and forgive her enemies. And -- and this should be the criterion for any critic -- she makes me want to read books I haven't read and reread those I have. Feb 02, Vel Veeter rated it it was amazing Shelves: pages , cbr The header picture of this review is Elizabeth Hardwick talking with her former student Darryl Pinckney, also a novelist and critic.
He writes the introduction to this collection from the perspective what it was like to be the student of Hardwick. This is exactly the kind of introduction this book needs. Her stuff is a little more timeless, written for a public The header picture of this review is Elizabeth Hardwick talking with her former student Darryl Pinckney, also a novelist and critic.
Her stuff is a little more timeless, written for a public intelligentsia, and in that way it might not have as much depth as academic writing, but it has more weight. A genius may indeed go to his grave unread, but he will hardly have gone to it unpraised. Sweet, bland commendations fall everywhere upon the scene; a universal, if somewhat lobotomized, accommodation reigns.
A book is born into a puddle of treacle; the brine of hostile criticism is only a memory.
- Document Analysis Systems: Theory and Practice: Third IAPR Workshop, DAS’98 Nagano, Japan, November 4–6, 1998 Selected Papers!
- Collected Essays on Finance and Economics .
- Collected Essays : Hippocampus Press, specializes in classic horror and science fiction.
- Navigation menu.
- Item Preview!
- Freedom in bondage : the life and teachings of Adeu Rinpoche;
I will come back in a later review to the topic of commercialization of art and writing from a perspective from Britain of the s when I finish reading New Grub Street by George Gissing. However, just looking at this quotation and placing it in a context of the late s, it seems incredible to me how prescient and correct she is. I pay close attention to a lot of books coming out. I will leave aside genre fiction, pop culture, and YA because those do in fact fill a particular marketplace and audience that should be a little more guarded against serious criticism. And a final point on those kinds of works, so long as they are enjoyable and relatively harmless so, for example, not deeply racist or anti-trans they should escape much criticism beyond someone liking it or not.
But I am concerned about the state of public literary criticism in the production of adult fiction that also has aspirations on being literary. I think of those four two will be completely off the landscape in a year or so.
The Collected Essays of Arthur Miller, Edited by Matthew Roudané - book review | The Independent
The other two, one because of quality and the other because of popularity will likely stick around. But I also long for more honesty about that writing and more honesty about what fiction is and what it can do. I plan o using this book more so in the next few weeks, so you will see more from it as I read some of the subjects of her essays alongside returning to the essays themselves. I like having reading assignments to guide my path a little bit and along with my goals from my Mavis Gallant review, I hope to write my reviews a little conscientiously too.
I have never read any work of fiction wrote by Elizabeth Hardwick, but from time to time I would read a book with her Introduction and sometimes, the introductions were the best part. So I was delighted to read this collection of Essay and I would have loved to know every author and story she was talking about. Unluckily it is not so, but it was still a fantastic reading! Jan 15, Jason rated it it was amazing.
Reading Elizabeth Hardwick's collected essays, composed as they were between and , teaches this particular thirty-nine-year-old communicant and enthusiastic student of life nothing if not that he still has much to learn. Sometimes one feels almost defeated when confronting the writing of masters of the very highest caliber, but I am actually mightily grateful I cannot write half as well as Elizabeth Hardwick, as I lack the constitution necessary to withstand the delight in myself such g Reading Elizabeth Hardwick's collected essays, composed as they were between and , teaches this particular thirty-nine-year-old communicant and enthusiastic student of life nothing if not that he still has much to learn.
Sometimes one feels almost defeated when confronting the writing of masters of the very highest caliber, but I am actually mightily grateful I cannot write half as well as Elizabeth Hardwick, as I lack the constitution necessary to withstand the delight in myself such gifts would confer. The supernatural rightness is consistently a matter less of facts than of greater truths.
- Popular Posts.
- Globalization and Families: Accelerated Systemic Social Change.
- Get The Lithub Daily.
- Subscriber Login;
- Collected Essays Vol. 2 : Woolf, Virginia : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive!
- The Collected Essays of Elizabeth Hardwick review – sublime critical insights.
Gass to be the be the finest ever writer of English sentences whose fiction finds him working prodigiously at the highest level of mastery and whose essays are without peer. Well, not so much without peer as it turns out. A full immersion in the product of her craft establishes Hardwick very much as his peer, an equal at the very least. Gass, however, is far more butch. If he is a big swooping bird of prey with enormous talons, Hardwick moves across densely furnished rooms with the litheness and speed of a cat. We might say she splits the difference between the loquacious onrush of Gass and the balletic dexterity of Joan Didion, about whom she has written appreciatively, though it should be clear that the scope of her learning is more comparable to that of the former.
She shares with Nabokov, as the Russian transplant demonstrates in his Cambridge lectures, a fascination with plotting and literary architecture. She loves a good sentence just as she is able to provide them with punctual regularity, but what wins her heart are the fiction writer's worlds, inhabitable and amenable to fruitful scrutiny.
Fictional constructs are also available for the incursion of her wit, often dry. There are sentences and paragraphs here that could nurture one for several lifetimes worth of suspended animation. Ring Lardner is a writer I intend to get to in short order, entirely on account of Hardwick's fascinating consideration of his stories. Most people who read this book will come away with fattened reading lists. You may also find much to recommend in appreciations of old favourites.
Some of the essays move away from direct literary criticism towards cultural commentary or even a kind of encompassing sociology. She was productively attentive to the Civil Rights movement and sundry sociocultural mutations. Random—a felicitous phrase that gives no substance to the devastation. She loves to study the letters of these writers, seeing them almost as intimates.